Industrial Energy Optimization

Measurable savings in energy-intensive manufacturing.

Cevik LLC engineers measurement-driven improvements across furnaces, compressed air, electrical, and automation systems — verified against operational data in active production facilities.

01 / 04
VALIDATED IMPACT

Two facilities. Two methodologies. Same outcome — measured savings.

The numbers below are taken from formal engineering reports on the Tuzla and Dilovası production facilities. Each figure is supported by field measurement and operational data validation.

Live system · drag to spin
1.55MkWh/yr
Electricity saved — Tuzla
792,400Nm³/yr
Natural gas saved — Tuzla
1.7MkWh/yr
Electricity saved — Dilovası
3,550+tons CO₂
Annual emissions reduced
0.18 YEAR PAYBACK
Pump optimization at Tuzla — engineering analysis validated under real production load.
Read the technical case study →
METHODOLOGY

A practical workflow — every stage produces an actionable output.

Aligned with ISO 50001 energy management principles, but distinguished by its focus on execution: solutions prioritized by measurable impact, operational feasibility, and financial return.

01
Assessment
Evaluate major industrial systems to determine operating conditions, production demand, and performance constraints across thermal, electrical, mechanical, and automation systems.
02
Data collection
Field measurement of energy consumption, load patterns, flue gas, flow rates, thermal imaging — establishing actual operating performance, not nominal specs.
03
Diagnostics
System-level analysis using calibrated instruments (ultrasonic flow meters, energy analyzers, leak detectors) to identify the inefficiencies that matter.
04
Engineering design
Targeted optimization strategies aligned with facility conditions. Each measure quantified — projected savings, capital required, payback, operational feasibility.
05
Implementation support
Coordination with plant engineering, maintenance, and operations to convert identified measures into operational actions without disrupting production.
06
Verification
Post-implementation measurement against baseline. KPI analysis confirms improvements in energy consumption, reliability, and system behavior.
CASE STUDIES

Two facilities. Repeatable methodology.

Tuzla facility · Aluminum production
1,552,026 kWh and 792,400 Nm³ saved per year — combined financial savings exceeding 1.85M TL.
0.18 yrsPump optimization payback
2,400+ tCO₂ reduced
Dilovası facility · Repeatability confirmed
1,712,126 kWh saved annually with 230,000+ TL in cost reduction — same methodology, different facility.
220KTrees equivalent
ISO 50001Aligned
READY TO START
Bring measurable improvement to your facility.

Begin with a no-commitment scoping conversation. We review your facility's energy profile, identify high-impact targets, and propose a structured engagement.